Asus K52JT

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus K52JT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K52JT
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '21 at 17:50
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 57.7 1-Core 68 2-Core 110 47% 78.7 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 140 19% 143 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M 2,918 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1C92) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 1.9 1% 2.07 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ParsPower 120GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1211A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 190 193 202 193 174 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.3% Average	Read 225 Write 198 Mixed 197 SusWrite 190 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 12.2 58% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 70.5 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 25.1 46% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 70%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 281GB free Firmware: 0003SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 66 69 68 68 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 66.5 Write 62.5 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 67.5 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273EB0-CK0 Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF 8GB 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.8% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.2 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	11	9	60	15.5"	1366 768	AUO26EC

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K52JT Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus K52JT

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	23x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	21x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon HD 6300MAMDBench 1%, 2,918 samples	81x
Radeon HD 6370MAMDBench 1%, 535 samples	8x
Radeon HD 6300M Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)AMDBench 1%, 20 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $22Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	3x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 753 samples	11x
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 2x2GBAsintBench 27%, 888 samples	6x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $232

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16