Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX516PR
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201216
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '21 at 15:21
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11370H 12,227 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 67.4 1-Core 178 2-Core 336 101% 194 Pts	4-Core 580 8-Core 781 86% 680 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 160C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	Lighting 30 Reflection 144 Parallax 31.3 24% 68.6 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 36 Splatting 22 22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 20%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB 7,746 User benchmarks, average bench 257% 399GB free (System drive) Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,562 Write 1,288 Mixed 1,158 297% 1,336 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 47.9 157% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,022 DQ Write 384 DQ Mixed 860 595% 756 MB/s
Poor: 165% Great: 330%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB 12,066 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 34.4 Write 2.2 Mixed 6.7 12% 14.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB 1,916 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 24GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 67.3 Write 67.7 Mixed 44.5 75% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB 57,752 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.3% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 22.1 80% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 39.7 SC Mixed 17.8 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	144	15.5"	1280 720	NCP004D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR Builds (Compare 2,668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

CPU
Core i7-11370HIntelBench 74%, 12,227 samples	2,647x
Core i5-11300HIntelBench 71%, 8,880 samples	21x

GPU
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	1,340x
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	1,325x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1x

SSD
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBNvmeBench 229%, 5,082 samples	635x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	533x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 257%, 7,746 samples	352x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2B1 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GBMicronBench 58%, 1,942 samples	590x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	547x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GBMicronBench 67%, 5,644 samples	357x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16