Lenovo 80G0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80G0  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A6
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150803
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 14:49
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N3540
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 55
1-Core 25
2-Core 49.8
30% 43.3 Pts
4-Core 98.8
8-Core 100
13% 99.5 Pts
64-Core 98.6
6% 98.6 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 820M
Legend(17AA 3818) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7667
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6
Parallax 1.5
4% 4.03 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 5.3
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 227 212 217 218 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.9% Good
Read 223
Write 219
Mixed 196
SusWrite 221
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 30.7
99% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 116
109% 168 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 111%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
237GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 23.9
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 17.8
18% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 59%
Patriot Memory 32GB
21GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
8.7% Terrible
Read 25.6
Write 18
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 15.3
23% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C2GCZ.AU30C 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.4% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 23.5" 1280 720 ACI24C7 ASUS VP247
Typical 80G0 Builds (Compare 730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80G0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback