Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 13:17
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8370-$190
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 162
69% 112 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 545
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 552
37% 552 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
PowerColor(148C 2015) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 31.1
20% 29.2 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 21.7
18% 23.7 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 23%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 291 295 296 298 298 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 458
Mixed 369
SusWrite 302
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 51.2
168% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 260
195% 261 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
624GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 69 98 48 24 2.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 446
Write 300
Mixed 196
SusWrite 80.9
56% 256 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 6.9
58% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 20.4
35% 68.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 57%
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
561GB free
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 35 68 55 90 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 437
Write 250
Mixed 218
SusWrite 77
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 10.3
64% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 82.6
DQ Mixed 8.9
31% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 108%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
300GB free
Firmware: 4L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 972 1088 677 587 589 588 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,333
Write 1,033
Mixed 1,036
SusWrite 750
232% 1,038 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 69.8
230% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 563
DQ Write 414
DQ Mixed 521
380% 499 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 193%
Great: 285%
Seagate IronWolf 3TB (2016)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 178 176 177 179 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 159
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 177
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 19.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 16
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 4% 26 207 156 60 27" 1920 1080 ACI27F6 ASUS VE278
History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 5: 1R 0G 0B
Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 1,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $650
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback