Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 11:48
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$226
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 186
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 483
52% 407 Pts
64-Core 566
38% 566 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Zotac(19DA 2346) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 15.8
14% 14.4 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 16.1
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 17%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$120
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 429
Write 362
Mixed 326
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 43.4
142% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 351
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
34GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,086
Write 875
Mixed 483
180% 815 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 38.1
137% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 787
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 628
493% 684 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 236%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$65
23GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 116
Write 18.7
Mixed 63.1
50% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 88%
Generic USB Flash Disk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 19.1
Write 6
11% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 2: 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 9% 23 49 5 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $431
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback