Asus PRIME Z590M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z590M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 06:39
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900-$275
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 66
1-Core 157
2-Core 307
92% 177 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,149
105% 880 Pts
64-Core 1,994
123% 1,994 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Lighting 39.4
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 37.5
32% 39.6 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 39.5
34% 42.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 250GB-$89
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 161 190 188 196 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 484
Write 462
Mixed 297
SusWrite 191
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 29.9
108% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 211
177% 257 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
376GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 465 467 461 467 471 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 483
Mixed 387
SusWrite 465
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 52.6
173% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 352
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
367GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 467 471 464 468 472 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 480
Mixed 409
SusWrite 467
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 53
174% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 351
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
SSD 1TB
150GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 294 193 236 238 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 456
Write 309
Mixed 370
SusWrite 241
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 35.4
136% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 35
76% 161 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 103%
WD My Passport 1.5TB
878GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 54 76 69 76 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 83.7
Write 51.3
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 72.2
80% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HDS72302 2TB
271GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 36
Write 33.9
Mixed 32
SusWrite 39.4
48% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
78% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 72%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
7.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 132 116 121 116 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 185
Write 188
Mixed 168
SusWrite 118
222% 165 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 3.1
265% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 107%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
157GB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 106 104 106 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 114
Write 105
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 106
133% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.8
236% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 65%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
2TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 87 86 87 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 95.8
Write 90.1
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 86.6
112% 84 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 65%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
2.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 166 166 172 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 160
Write 163
Mixed 175
SusWrite 171
231% 167 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.7
311% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 107%
WD easystore 264D 14TB
2.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 96 95 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 101
Write 106
Mixed 137
SusWrite 95.7
153% 110 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 3.1
290% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3007 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 19
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 22.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical PRIME Z590M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z590M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $698
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback