Biostar TA75M+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar TA75M+  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110913
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 04:33
Run Duration369 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 50.9
34% 50.2 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 176
21% 162 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.7% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 12.5
8% 11.6 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 11.3
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.7%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN07985
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 172 173 169 171 172 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Seagate Portable 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 35
Write 36.4
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 21.6
23% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 68%
Generic External 750GB
37GB free, PID 3960
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 30.1
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 19.2
36% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 39%
Mass Storage Device 16GB
4GB free, PID 125d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.8 8.2 8.9 7.9 6.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 1
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 8
10% 8.52 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB Kingston HP497157-D88-ELFWG 51264Y133I HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 16GB
1600, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 9.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 3R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 11% 74 46 6 60 21.5" 1920 1080 ITE7913 EZCAP28X
History: Score 32: 4R 3G 3B | Score 27: 3R 2G 6B | Score 16: 1R 2G 5B | Score 25: 3R 2G 4B | Score 26: 3R 3G 2B
Typical TA75M+ Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA75M+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $81
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback