MSI B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B89
MotherboardMSI B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89)  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 02:52
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 82.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 1,096
99% 834 Pts
64-Core 2,104
130% 2,104 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 171
Parallax 165
154% 175 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 133
Splatting 116
114% 144 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 65 306 218 103 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 428
Write 367
Mixed 381
SusWrite 195
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 37.4
127% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 136
135% 221 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 104%
CT2000P1SSD8 2TB
245GB free
Firmware: P3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1002 1013 166 163 165 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,337
Write 1,050
Mixed 966
SusWrite 447
212% 950 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 69.6
226% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,019
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 360
357% 590 MB/s
Poor: 169%
This bench: 183%
Great: 321%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
230GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 141 142 147 143 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 104
Mixed 18
SusWrite 142
71% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
278GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 80 68 67 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 92.5
Write 110
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 74.4
64% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
168% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 66%
WD Game Drive 5TB
849GB free, PID 2638
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 77 77 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 94.2
Write 94.9
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 77.1
115% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
128% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$160
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 40.1
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 36
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89) Builds (Compare 966 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450M MORTAR (MS-7B89) - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback