Asus M4A77T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M4A77T (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100819
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '21 at 02:51
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 645 5,346 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	45% Average	Memory 59.7 1-Core 44.8 2-Core 90.1 40% 64.9 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 176 24% 177 Pts	64-Core 175 11% 175 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 34D6) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.00 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	3.11% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.6 3% 2.6 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 3.6 3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.11% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3320413CS 320GB 2,473 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: CA14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 77 86 83 88 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 75.6 Write 81.5 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 83.8 51% 69.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 56%
Hitachi HDT721025SLA380 250GB-$105 2,148 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 115GB free Firmware: STBOA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 70 Write 62.9 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 72.5 45% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 49%
Mass Storage Device 32GB 1,016 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 27GB free, PID 125d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 15 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	8.96% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 13.7 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 14.5 21% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.3 84% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.7% Poor	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 11.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 9.2 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	65	15.4"	1280 720	SAM01AC SyncMaster

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A77T Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A77T

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	9x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	6x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	5x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	3x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	3x

SSD
SSDNow V+200 Series 60GBKingstonBench 64%, 127 samples	3x
Z400s 128GBSanDisk $109Bench 61%, 10,807 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	11x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	10x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $394

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16