Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141111
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 01:14
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
67% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 192
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 374
37% 303 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67%
Great: 82%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 5.7
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 3%
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 1E04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
142% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 183
Parallax 218
152% 196 fps
MRender 239
Gravity 195
Splatting 153
155% 195 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 142%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 128GB-$40
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 80 69 61 59 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 297
Write 313
Mixed 241
SusWrite 80.3
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 31.2
106% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 158
137% 204 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 104%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
62GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 228 274 218 183 190 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 326
Write 320
Mixed 308
SusWrite 214
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 42.6
140% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 239
179% 240 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 133%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
103GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 70 69 66 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 102
Write 103
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 67.8
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.9% Above average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 6R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 36% 42 263 158 144 21.5" 1920 1080 BNQ789B BenQ GL2250
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 47: 6R 4G 5B
Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $657
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback