To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '21 at 00:27
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1800 187 User benchmarks, average bench 30% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 47.7 1-Core 23.8 2-Core 44.4 26% 38.6 Pts	4-Core 47.8 8-Core 46.1 6% 46.9 Pts	64-Core 45.9 3% 45.9 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 0F31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.6 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 120GB 1,698 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0212B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 49 53 51 52 51 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.4% Below average	Read 236 Write 200 Mixed 117 SusWrite 74.1 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 15 61% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 50.1 DQ Mixed 20.5 34% 68.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 109%
Jmicron Generic 120GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 50GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 25.1 Mixed 29.1 SusWrite 26 21% 28 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 5.8 1,018% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D3S1333M/8G 1x8GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 6.4 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	0"	1280 720	Default

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	615x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	102x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16