PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asus B150M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150831 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 21 '21 at 23:38 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
59%
Above average
|
63% 102 Pts
|
34% 264 Pts
|
21% 315 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.9%
Below average
|
38% 48.7 fps
|
40% 48.3 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
53GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 194 136 134 133 132 MB/s
|
89.9%
Excellent
|
79% 353 MB/s
|
147% 52.5 MB/s
|
270% 361 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$92
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 274 247 234 229 218 MB/s
|
89.1%
Excellent
|
71% 315 MB/s
|
136% 47.8 MB/s
|
268% 359 MB/s
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21% | 33% | 27 | 107 | 6 | 120 | 27" | 1920 1080 | SAM0DC9 C27FG70 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-6500Intel $180Bench 71%, 227,742 samples | 499x |
Core i5-6400Intel $182Bench 68%, 180,044 samples | 472x |
Core i7-6700Intel $291Bench 75%, 258,369 samples | 410x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 34%, 370,099 samples | 322x |
GTX 970Nvidia $125Bench 50%, 823,201 samples | 268x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,449,936 samples | 183x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 49% - Average | Total price: $650 |