Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 22:33
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$397
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 159
2-Core 316
99% 185 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 839
81% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,502
93% 1,502 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.67 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 30 61 241 151 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 457
Write 392
Mixed 337
SusWrite 157
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 30.6
107% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 158
131% 188 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70%
Great: 87%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$125
2TB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1919 1923 1058 944 871 982 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1059
Write 1,886
Mixed 1,126
SusWrite 1,283
304% 1,338 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 58.2
273% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 1,254
DQ Mixed 1,296
840% 940 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 236%
Great: 307%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
954GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1367 1370 1337 1337 1348 899 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,532
Write 1349
Mixed 1,022
SusWrite 1,276
291% 1,295 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 82
283% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 640
DQ Write 832
DQ Mixed 472
430% 648 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 260%
Great: 255%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
112GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 206 90 90 89 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69% Good
Read 479
Write 374
Mixed 338
SusWrite 160
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 17.9
105% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 164
137% 197 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69%
Great: 87%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 190 110 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 172
Write 158
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 118
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
375% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 33.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 35.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 2 0 60 23.8" 1280 720 XVS2410 XK2410H
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,196
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback