To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 20:51
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8600-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 116
52% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 111
15% 112 Pts
64-Core 113
8% 113 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 32
Parallax 30
17% 27.6 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 22
Splatting 21.5
18% 23.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 21%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$37
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 68 80 77 76 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 5
Write 25.5
Mixed 13
SusWrite 76.4
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 71%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
120GB free
Firmware: VT100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 63 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 55.5
Write 62
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 61.9
41% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 39%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
100GB free
Firmware: VT100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 42 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 63
Write 67.8
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 41.6
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.2% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 7,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $185
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback