Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190418
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '21 at 13:20
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 72.6 1-Core 110 2-Core 145 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 683 59% 505 Pts	64-Core 1255 78% 1255 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.1% Above average	Lighting 70.4 Reflection 98.2 Parallax 61.6 57% 76.7 fps	MRender 71.7 Gravity 71.5 Splatting 65.8 57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST2000NM0011 2TB-$60 4,076 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: SN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 77 115 136 134 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 136 Write 125 Mixed 71.4 SusWrite 119 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 86%
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB 3,111 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 298GB free Firmware: 21.00M21 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 61 63 62 63 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 61.1 Write 60.5 Mixed 42.7 SusWrite 61.8 42% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB 87,891 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 45 MC Write 38.1 MC Mixed 33.5 111% 38.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 30.9 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 95.4 42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	72x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	32x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	37x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	28x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	10x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $528

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16