Asus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	16.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201110
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '21 at 07:17
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 82.2 1-Core 123 2-Core 245 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 543 64% 493 Pts	64-Core 652 40% 652 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Gigabyte(1458 36DA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1774 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.9% Above average	Lighting 73.3 Reflection 78 Parallax 69.2 60% 73.5 fps	MRender 70.4 Gravity 67.9 Splatting 62.4 54% 66.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 37 35 36 34 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 476 Write 452 Mixed 364 SusWrite 64 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 86.1 4K Mixed 47 162% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 226 204% 309 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 118%
Toshiba HDWG160 6TB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 164 163 164 160 165 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 164 Mixed 56 SusWrite 162 101% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 132%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB 4,404 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 115GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 63 54 44 32 28 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 142 Write 64.7 Mixed 87.4 SusWrite 45.3 103% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.6 181% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 44%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 321GB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 43 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 37.9 Write 41.9 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 42.1 54% 39 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 52%
WD My Passport 1TB 12,840 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 224GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 64 63 64 62 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 77.5 Write 75.2 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 63 89% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2Z2933C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2Z2933C16 32GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	62.4% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 18.8 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 19.1 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23"	1280 720	DELD0D6 DELL P2319H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX H370-F GAMING

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	266x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	190x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	113x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	85x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	48x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	39x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	34x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	36x
CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 23,313 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16