Asrock Z490 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 131% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 146% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z490 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	48.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200616
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '21 at 03:17
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900KF-$260 21,040 User benchmarks, average bench 99% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 88.6 1-Core 160 2-Core 316 102% 188 Pts	4-Core 627 8-Core 1,263 111% 945 Pts	64-Core 2,137 132% 2,137 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 470.76 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 178 Reflection 161 Parallax 160 145% 166 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 156 Splatting 128 114% 141 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$114 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 485GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 79 79 79 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 357 Write 85.2 Mixed 116 SusWrite 78.9 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 22.6 97% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 86 DQ Mixed 100 81% 118 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 931GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1145 1150 1154 1157 1135 1133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	246% Outstanding	Read 1,302 Write 1,114 Mixed 1,121 SusWrite 1,146 263% 1,170 MB/s	4K Read 60 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 79.6 257% 86.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1056 DQ Write 901 DQ Mixed 979 734% 979 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 410%
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$149 2,380 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 477GB free Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1291 1297 1215 1070 1068 1066 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 1,375 Write 1,309 Mixed 714 SusWrite 1,168 256% 1,142 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 56.3 193% 68.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,043 DQ Write 890 DQ Mixed 791 641% 908 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 237%
Plextor PX-1TM9PG + 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 214% 310GB free Firmware: 1.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 281 295 232 244 233 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	148% Outstanding	Read 1,523 Write 785 Mixed 145 SusWrite 255 148% 677 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 58.7 4K Mixed 36.9 134% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 1,076 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 274 312% 554 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 307%
Seagate Expansion 5TB 2,792 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 96GB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 66 59 60 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 73.8 Write 73.2 Mixed 78.9 SusWrite 61.3 54% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 169% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 5TB 2,792 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4.5TB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 126 126 129 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 100 Write 119 Mixed 79.6 SusWrite 128 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.9 204% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 67%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 242GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 91 91 92 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 120 Write 122 Mixed 70.3 SusWrite 90.2 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351 1,197 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.1% Very good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 21.9 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 23.5 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 172%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	165	27"	1280 720	ACI27EC ROG PG279Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z490 Taichi Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 205%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 219%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z490 Taichi

CPU
Core i9-10900KIntel $449Bench 100%, 107,269 samples	184x
Core i9-10850KIntel $286Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	103x
Core i7-10700KIntel $236Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	101x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	101x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	75x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	68x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	35x
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TBBench 276%, 15,624 samples	28x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x16GBUnknownBench 90%, 3,173 samples	29x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-4000 4x8GBUnknownBench 102%, 1,219 samples	17x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBKingstonBench 90%, 54,651 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $1,850

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16