Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 02:35
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 458
62% 462 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 37.6
Reflection 41.5
Parallax 38.6
31% 39.2 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 0.2
19% 25.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 83 44 66 32 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 450
Write 377
Mixed 310
SusWrite 79
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 15.3
74% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 89.9
DQ Mixed 32.7
44% 79.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
82GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 163 148 160 168 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 145
Write 128
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 158
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 113%
WD WD1001FALS-41Y6A1 1TB
289GB free
Firmware: 05.03D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2 2.3 1.9 1.8 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 115
Write 2.2
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 2
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 1R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 11% 70 107 6 60 31.6" 1920 1080 SAM7024 LC32T55
History: Score 8: 1R 0G 3B | Score 18: 1R 3G 4B
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $327
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback