Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z170-P (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180516
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '21 at 02:19
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 101 2-Core 187 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 604 61% 493 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3653 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 135 Parallax 118 98% 124 fps	MRender 145 Gravity 103 Splatting 97 92% 115 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 127GB 2,962 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1126K Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 445 Write 276 Mixed 272 73% 331 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 86.7 4K Mixed 40 143% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 65.1 DQ Mixed 188 134% 176 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 89%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 429GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 77 80 81 80 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 77.9 Write 65.5 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 76.8 46% 63 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 75% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 67%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 9GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 67 80 86 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 70.5 Write 71.8 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 73.5 48% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron CT4G4DFS8213.8FA11 Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR CT4G4DFS8213.8FA11 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73.3% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 22.9 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 22.2 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	1,135x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	920x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	523x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	548x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	535x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	289x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	194x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	161x
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $42Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	86x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	128x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 83%, 37,519 samples	123x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $531

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16