Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX506LI
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210202
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '21 at 19:37
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	PER-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10870H 23,498 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 60.3 2-Core 129 55% 89.9 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 439 42% 348 Pts	64-Core 664 41% 664 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1E91) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	4.21% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 53.2 Parallax 3 3% 20.1 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 6.7 6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.21% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB 33,645 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 307GB free (System drive) Firmware: P6MA001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1021 1000 1081 1072 924 537 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 1,525 Write 1,082 Mixed 986 SusWrite 939 253% 1,133 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 94.3 4K Mixed 58.5 199% 67.2 MB/s	DQ Read 586 DQ Write 450 DQ Mixed 264 267% 434 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 247%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free Firmware: LDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 113 120 122 121 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 95.9 Write 104 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 120 69% 94 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB 42,443 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.5% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 22.9 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 20.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	144	15.5"	1280 720	CMN1521

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI Builds (Compare 2,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

CPU
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	2,409x
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	322x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	27x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	1,527x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	1,230x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,203 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	1,044x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	394x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	353x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples	529x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	488x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	366x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16