MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory50.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200907
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 19:24
Run Duration348 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 69.5
1-Core 162
2-Core 310
95% 181 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 1,049
100% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,540
95% 1,540 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.3% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 109
Parallax 115
103% 117 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 82.6
83% 105 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
9GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,498
Write 2410
Mixed 1808
499% 2,239 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 84.5
290% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 736
DQ Mixed 761
578% 778 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 920 664 650 645 630 626 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,281
Write 1,506
Mixed 1,508
SusWrite 689
333% 1,496 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 75
252% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 679
DQ Mixed 694
534% 728 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 245%
Great: 340%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
687GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2961 2974 2976 2759 1554 1554 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
377% Outstanding
Read 2,655
Write 3,040
Mixed 2815
SusWrite 2,463
620% 2,743 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 85.6
277% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 832
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 751
563% 753 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 377%
Great: 488%
WD WD10SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB
572GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 136 137 139 138 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 89.4
Write 104
Mixed 76
SusWrite 136
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
154% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 24.6
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 26
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 40% 5 7 5 144 24" 1536 841 MSI3BA5 MSI MAG240CR
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,210
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback