Megaware H55H-CM

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Megaware H55H-CM (all builds)
Motherboard	MEGAWARE MW-H55H-CM
Memory	8.9 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100518
Uptime	6.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '21 at 19:00
Run Duration	277 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 58.5 1-Core 83.1 2-Core 162 57% 101 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 206 27% 203 Pts	64-Core 217 13% 217 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(7377 0000) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.07% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 3.6 3% 3.13 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 4 Splatting 6.7 4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.07% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
P3-512 512GB 2,855 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 258GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1130A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 68 26 42 35 40 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.3% Below average	Read 226 Write 209 Mixed 199 SusWrite 51.8 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 15.6 73% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.8 DQ Write 76.9 DQ Mixed 22.1 25% 40.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 104%
Xraydisk 120GB 120GB 543 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 96GB free Firmware: SBFQBB.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 65 32 42 38 42 MB/s Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.3% Average	Read 231 Write 214 Mixed 200 SusWrite 53.9 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 56.4 4K Mixed 31.1 111% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.6 DQ Write 76.3 DQ Mixed 37.2 33% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 14GB 9,406 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.8% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 12.5 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.7 21% 7.5 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 15: 0R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
15%	8%	106	71	38	60	18.5"	1366 768	SAM0632 SMB1930N

History: Score 8: 1R 1G 0B | Score 21: 1R 3G 7B | Score 15: 0R 3G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H55H-CM Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Megaware H55H-CM

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	6x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	5x
Xeon X3470IntelBench 69%, 8,730 samples	5x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	4x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
R9 290XAMD $549Bench 51%, 37,353 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	2x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	1x

RAM
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	7x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	5x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16