Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 18:24
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8086K-$692
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 225
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 610
64% 502 Pts
64-Core 721
48% 721 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.3% Very good
Lighting 97.7
Reflection 99.7
Parallax 85.9
79% 94.4 fps
MRender 77.3
Gravity 83.5
Splatting 86.1
67% 82.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 88%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 136 137 129 127 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 427
Write 144
Mixed 194
SusWrite 136
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 29.7
119% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 157
146% 232 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
81GB free
Firmware: MS2OA610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 109 100 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 138
Write 125
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 109
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 99%
TrekStor DS maxi g.u 1TB
825GB free, PID b159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 34.2
Write 34.3
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 36.6
46% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 20%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 106 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 117
Write 99.5
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 107
134% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
196% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 22.6
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $1,549
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $38
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback