Lenovo 20071

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemLenovo 20071  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Guam
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 17:28
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Phenom II N870 Triple-Core
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 84.7
37% 59.4 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 127
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Legend(17AA 3949) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.8
0% 1 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK7559GSXF 750GB
653GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GQ005B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 60 44 42 33 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 90.6
Write 85
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 48.9
49% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 6GB
1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 10.7
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 20071 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20071

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $50
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $199Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $179
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback