MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210512
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 17:06
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 167
2-Core 331
108% 198 Pts
4-Core 644
8-Core 986
101% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,160
72% 1,160 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 8695) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 3900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 132
Parallax 154
132% 149 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 149
Splatting 120
126% 160 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 124%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 491 492 491 495 496 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 498
Mixed 471
SusWrite 492
112% 495 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 63.5
216% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 372
280% 375 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
464GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 494 495 493 431 362 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 497
Mixed 460
SusWrite 460
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 69.7
234% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 373
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 139%
Great: 129%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
464GB free
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2412 2349 2352 2365 2409 2403 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
410% Outstanding
Read 2,411
Write 2,421
Mixed 2,002
SusWrite 2,382
520% 2,304 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 251
4K Mixed 92.1
342% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1533
DQ Write 1,325
DQ Mixed 1,435
1,074% 1,431 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 410%
Great: 390%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
464GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1054 876 873 879 864 876 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
335% Outstanding
Read 2,637
Write 1,453
Mixed 1,621
SusWrite 904
367% 1,654 MB/s
4K Read 74.8
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 106
351% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,523
DQ Write 1,398
DQ Mixed 1,424
1,078% 1,448 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 335%
Great: 355%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 197 197 196 197 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 196
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 196
109% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 53.5
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 48
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 35.3
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 47.5
106% 37.2 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 121%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 3R 5G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 12% 113 347 289 60 31.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D34 C32F391
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $848
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback