Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 07:43
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 142
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 463
46% 374 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
XFX(1682 3233) 1GB
CLim: 1095 MHz, MLim: 1245 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 23.3
12% 19.6 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 13.7
12% 15.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1039 1055 1076 1077 1067 957 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,293
Write 988
Mixed 933
SusWrite 1,045
239% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 69.9
252% 90.4 MB/s
DQ Read 530
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 310
246% 352 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 210%
Great: 355%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
96GB free
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 55 53 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 41.7
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 53.6
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
905GB free
Firmware: JA0O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 95 92 96 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 83.8
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 94.2
53% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 59%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 185 177 176 185 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 103
Mixed 106
SusWrite 181
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.1
304% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 106%
Great: 105%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 83.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 142 140 145 140 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 132
Write 129
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 142
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.4
231% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 99%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
3TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 96.5
Mixed 92.2
106% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
207% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB HMT325U6EFR8C-PB HMT325U6CFR8C-PB HMT325U6EFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 17.4
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback