Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 02:23
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$363
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 258
94% 164 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 933
89% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,398
94% 1,398 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
EVGA(3842 3885) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 108
Parallax 139
130% 136 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 215
Splatting 80.2
162% 143 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 145%
Great: 228%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
98GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1000 997 896 861 625 469 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 123%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88
107GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1336 299 299 299 300 299 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,616
Write 1,406
Mixed 548
SusWrite 472
224% 1,011 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 44
160% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,144
DQ Write 1,039
DQ Mixed 767
664% 984 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 191%
Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$78
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,636
Write 1,078
Mixed 480
233% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 52.1
176% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,261
DQ Write 811
DQ Mixed 922
718% 998 MB/s
Poor: 155% Great: 257%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
163GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 293 294 295 291 290 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 445
Mixed 377
SusWrite 298
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 45.7
148% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 123%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$50
20GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 80 123 123 113 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 60.4
Write 72
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 106
51% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
162GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 109 108 107 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 95.8
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 108
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$100
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 23.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 20.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 14,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 169%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 168%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $2,444
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback