Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 114% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '21 at 02:23
Run Duration	255 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	95% Outstanding	Memory 94.2 1-Core 147 2-Core 274 96% 172 Pts	4-Core 514 8-Core 981 89% 747 Pts	64-Core 1,426 88% 1,426 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% EVGA(3842 3885) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	119% Outstanding	Lighting 161 Reflection 108 Parallax 139 131% 136 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 215 Splatting 80.2 111% 143 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 98GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1000 997 896 861 625 469 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 113%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 107GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1336 299 299 299 300 299 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	191% Outstanding	Read 1,616 Write 1,406 Mixed 548 SusWrite 472 224% 1,011 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 44 160% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,144 DQ Write 1,039 DQ Mixed 767 664% 984 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 191% Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,636 Write 1,078 Mixed 480 233% 1,065 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 52.1 176% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,261 DQ Write 811 DQ Mixed 922 718% 998 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 163GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 293 294 295 291 290 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 449 Write 445 Mixed 377 SusWrite 298 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 75.3 4K Mixed 45.7 148% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 352 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 20GB free Firmware: JP4OA3GH SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 80 123 123 113 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 60.4 Write 72 Mixed 40.6 SusWrite 106 51% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 162GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 109 108 107 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 99.6 Write 95.8 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 108 69% 94 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$60 93,353 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	MC Read 31 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 23.4 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 25.6 SC Mixed 20.8 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,482 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $440

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,853x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,606x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	554x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,302x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	649x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	639x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	856x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	564x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	288x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	253x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,388

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16