PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus G20BM_A68 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK G20BM_A68 |
Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170219 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 20 '21 at 01:32 |
Run Duration | 226 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
40.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.77
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 151 151 151 150 151 MB/s
|
81%
Excellent
|
|||
WD My Book Duo 25F6 16TB
241GB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 21 25 24 23 27 MB/s
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17% | 13% | 70 | 181 | 128 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | PHL091C PHL 221S8L |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-770K (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 1,664 samples | 35x |
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples | 2x |
A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 41%, 15,719 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R9 270AMD $140Bench 24%, 47,409 samples | 12x |
Radeon R9 370AMDBench 25%, 513 samples | 6x |
Radeon R9 255AMDBench 8%, 591 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 24% - Poor | Total price: $272 |