Gigabyte H370M D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H370M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte H370M D3H (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '21 at 01:16
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	88%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600-$165 18,241 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Memory 87.5 1-Core 131 2-Core 208 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 594 71% 546 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Gigabyte(1458 3FC3) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.2% Very good	Lighting 92 Reflection 93.1 Parallax 84 75% 89.7 fps	MRender 94.4 Gravity 88.9 Splatting 75.9 70% 86.4 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,052 Write 1,427 Mixed 759 242% 1,079 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 57.1 4K Mixed 43.1 142% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 718 DQ Write 940 DQ Mixed 914 666% 857 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 18GB free Firmware: M0CR060 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 423 Write 430 Mixed 346 89% 400 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 26.6 85% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 107 116% 192 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 25GB free Firmware: UE220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 65 61 57 55 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 399 Write 298 Mixed 100 SusWrite 79.6 48% 219 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 12.9 51% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 93.6 DQ Mixed 30.2 42% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 53%
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB 7,130 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1GB free Firmware: SBFK61E1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 69.4 Write 157 Mixed 115 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 23.3 91% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 269 DQ Mixed 182 158% 234 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 153GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 201 210 211 209 210 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 142 Write 147 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 206 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 106%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 5GB free Firmware: JU0G0A SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 68 100 104 106 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 85.6 Write 78.2 Mixed 41.7 SusWrite 85.3 53% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.4 147% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 79%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 10GB free Firmware: GR2OA3E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 52 54 53 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 49.7 Write 43.7 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 52.7 31% 42.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.4% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 21.1 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 19.9 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	144	27"	1280 720	AUS2782 VG279

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H370M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370M D3H - $95

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	139x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	133x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	42x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	32x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	19x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	15x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $460

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16