PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C51 |
Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191108 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 19 '21 at 22:19 |
Run Duration | 227 Seconds |
Run User | MAR-User |
Background CPU | 63% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
52%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
PNY(196E 1365) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team T253X2256G 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 258 210 184 196 213 MB/s
|
64.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
447GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 74 77 77 82 84 MB/s
|
46.1%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown S949A4UUH-ITR 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 24 | 7 | 5 | 60 | 23" | 1920 1080 | HWP294A HP LA2306 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 533x |
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 478x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 386x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 312x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 227x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 222x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $310 |