MSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	MSI MS-7992
Motherboard	MSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992) (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160826
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '21 at 22:13
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 79.5 2-Core 158 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 471 48% 387 Pts	64-Core 477 30% 477 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 112 Parallax 114 85% 110 fps	MRender 96.1 Gravity 102 Splatting 99.3 81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 405GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 210 241 258 244 242 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 330 Mixed 269 SusWrite 230 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 46.5 154% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 46.2 84% 168 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 401GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 255 278 275 330 329 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 334 Mixed 425 SusWrite 272 85% 382 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 76.7 4K Mixed 51.9 168% 56.3 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 45.3 DQ Mixed 64.6 73% 132 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 129%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30 20,238 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 223GB free Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 301 344 96 66 65 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 486 Write 403 Mixed 352 SusWrite 180 79% 355 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 29 120% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 157 130% 185 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 91%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 47GB free Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 164 176 186 188 189 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 450 Write 186 Mixed 222 SusWrite 170 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 15.2 94% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 89.2 DQ Write 79.6 DQ Mixed 29.1 37% 66 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 72%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,582 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 735GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 21.8 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 14.3 25% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.3 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 526GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 16 16 16 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 18.9 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 15.5 26% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB 7,092 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.5% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9.1 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 9 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	75	27"	1280 720	IVM663B PL2730H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992) Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	86x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	24x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	14x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	13x

SSD
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	11x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16