Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-C

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-C (all builds)
Motherboard	FF50 06F7
Memory	1.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150727
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '21 at 20:11
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) 28,018 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Memory 34.2 1-Core 33.8 2-Core 64.1 26% 44 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 105 14% 107 Pts	64-Core 98.7 6% 98.7 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 F846) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.1.1 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 3.4 2% 3.3 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4 3% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB 10,970 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1001A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 256 94 39 46 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 412 Write 264 Mixed 255 SusWrite 117 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 17.7 72% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 44.6 64% 120 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 95%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 28 31 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 27.4 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 29.5 21% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.3 128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LFS1KBG/2G Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 6GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	15% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.17 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.8 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 231 17% 231 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 6: 0R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	2%	104	60	41	60	15.5"	1366 768	LGD0456

History: Score 2: 0R 0G 2B | Score 6: 0R 2G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C55D-C Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-C

CPU
A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 31%, 28,018 samples	14x
A4-7210 APU (2015 M.Ca)AMDBench 34%, 2,180 samples	8x
A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 32%, 2,254 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	14x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	8x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	5x

SSD
MZNLN128HCGR-00000 128GBSamsungBench 69%, 476 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
THNSNJ128GVNU 128GBToshibaBench 75%, 310 samples	2x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	5x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16