Asus M4A88TD-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A88TD-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 19:24
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 126
56% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 245
33% 243 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B E174) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 14.2
13% 16.3 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 9.5
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 13%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$49
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 213 228 257 247 270 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.2% Poor
Read 31.2
Write 81.4
Mixed 72
SusWrite 244
25% 107 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 9.4
34% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 6.7
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 10.4
8% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 101%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
297GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 113 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 111
Write 51.8
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 112
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 63%
UFD USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID a811
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.2 6.3 5.4 5.3 5.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 6
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5.7
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 13
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.9
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 17: 2R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 11% 61 69 56 60 7.2" 1360 768 SAM07D0 SAMSUNG
Typical M4A88TD-M EVO Builds (Compare 282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A88TD-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $156
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $379Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback