HP p6609it

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP p6609it  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3 550-$98
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 133
55% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 183
26% 189 Pts
64-Core 195
13% 195 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Zotac(19DA 288B) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 17.4
15% 18 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 15.8
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 17%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,817
Write 3,414
Mixed 2,713
668% 2,981 MB/s
4K Read 252
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 138
640% 181 MB/s
DQ Read 814
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 634
484% 661 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 122%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
337GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 70 71 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 78.3
Write 78.5
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 71.9
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 63%
Disk drive 2GB
2GB free, PID 9106
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.52% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 4
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4.3
6% 5.12 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
USB Mass Storage Device 4GB
4GB free, PID 8123
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.9 5.3 5.2 5 5.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 4
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.1
8% 7.45 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.3% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 13
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical p6609it Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6609it

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $132
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback