Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 16:23
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$97
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 99
2-Core 197
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 602
58% 479 Pts
64-Core 771
48% 771 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 43.3
Parallax 40.3
35% 42.2 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 44.4
Splatting 0.3
20% 27.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 79 80 39 78 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.1% Poor
Read 151
Write 96.2
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 70.7
22% 100 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 9.8
44% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 15.3
DQ Mixed 14.2
11% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
191GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 90 91 90 89 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46% Average
Read 72.7
Write 85.3
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 87.7
60% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46%
Great: 66%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
37GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 76.2
Write 53.8
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 76
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon-Power SP008GXLZU320BSB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 29.7
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 22.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 94
43% 94 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 4R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 13% 98 279 175 60 24" 1920 1080 ACR078F KA242Y B
History: Score 42: 5R 4G 5B | Score 39: 4R 5G 4B
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback