Asrock 880GM-LE

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock 880GM-LE (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110218
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '21 at 16:06
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 56.4 1-Core 11.4 2-Core 71.7 30% 46.5 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 154 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250 5,806 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 9715) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.9 1% 0.9 fps	MRender 0 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM001B SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 161 114 104 170 163 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.1% Below average	Read 217 Write 178 Mixed 185 SusWrite 147 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 17.9 4K Mixed 12.5 44% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 58.8 65% 110 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 111%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 653GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 76 80 77 79 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 125 Write 102 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 77.7 67% 91.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 539GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 106 114 112 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 119 Write 116 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 111 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 11.5 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	5	3	60	21.5"	1280 720	DEL2009 E2219HN

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 880GM-LE Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GM-LE

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	3x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	3x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	4x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	3x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	3x

SSD
T253A3512G 512GBTeamBench 79%, 575 samples	3x
E240e 240GBDeva'sBench 52%, 50 samples	2x
XPG SX930 120GBAdata $229Bench 88%, 1,100 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	16x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	5x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $275

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16