Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2295 188 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 70.7 1-Core 115 2-Core 284 82% 156 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 740 75% 606 Pts	64-Core 2,574 159% 2,574 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Dell(1028 12A0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.55 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.9% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 136 Parallax 122 96% 125 fps	MRender 167 Gravity 106 Splatting 116 104% 130 fps
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$168 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2136 2116 2094 2081 2015 2019 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	330% Outstanding	Read 1,988 Write 1,994 Mixed 1,910 SusWrite 2077 450% 1,992 MB/s	4K Read 53.9 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 72.8 251% 90.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,105 DQ Write 971 DQ Mixed 982 751% 1,019 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 330% Great: 526%
Micron 1300 SATA 512GB 598 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 261GB free Firmware: 0030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 453 453 455 383 382 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Read 314 Write 404 Mixed 342 SusWrite 432 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 38.7 141% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 346 260% 347 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 111%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB 7,722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 116GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 131 Write 64.4 Mixed 76.2 104% 90.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.9 129% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A8G40AB2-CWE 2x31.5GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 8 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.3% Good	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 20.9 70% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 9.7 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 106%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	7	60	31.5"	1280 720	DELA124 DELL U3219Q

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	5x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	4x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 250%, 4,056 samples	2x
Micron 2300 NVMe 1TBNvmeBench 233%, 415 samples	2x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	2x

RAM
HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 56%, 828 samples	6x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 2x8GBMicronBench 56%, 423 samples	3x
HMA81GR7CJR8N-VK 4x8GBHynixBench 74%, 266 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16