Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X403JA_X403JA

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X403JA_X403JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X403JA
Memory	2 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '21 at 13:04
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 34.9 1-Core 120 2-Core 222 64% 126 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 458 44% 365 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1162) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	4.63% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 7.8 6% 7.83 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 9.9 Splatting 0.1 3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.63% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 319 340 327 320 313 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 734 Write 465 Mixed 584 SusWrite 330 118% 528 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 32.1 129% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 507 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 610 404% 484 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 153%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4U6E3S4AA-MGCL 2x4GB 4,747 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 28.9 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 13.5 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 228 18% 228 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X403JA_X403JA Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X403JA_X403JA

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	4x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	4x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	3x
INTEL HBRPEKNX02 512GBNvmeBench 163%, 83 samples	1x

RAM
K4U6E3S4AA-MGCL 2x4GBSamsungBench 98%, 4,747 samples	3x
MT53E512M32D2NP-046 2x4GBMicronBench 87%, 764 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16