Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DJ_M509DJ

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DJ_M509DJ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509DJ
Memory	11.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200408
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '21 at 03:44
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	CIV-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Memory 63.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 198 68% 123 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 514 52% 423 Pts	64-Core 508 31% 508 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 14CF) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.34.06 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	8.13% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 16.8 Parallax 16.2 8% 14.3 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 13.6 Splatting 11.2 8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.13% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair MP400 1TB 8,627 User benchmarks, average bench 178% 840GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM53.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1716 1831 1773 1847 1951 1953 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	264% Outstanding	Read 1270 Write 1,932 Mixed 1,296 SusWrite 1,845 360% 1,586 MB/s	4K Read 45.6 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 67.1 224% 81.1 MB/s	DQ Read 743 DQ Write 645 DQ Mixed 835 588% 741 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 264% Great: 308%
Ct1000bx 50 1TB 468 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 364GB free Firmware: M6CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 72 28 258 429 435 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 506 Write 437 Mixed 383 SusWrite 270 90% 399 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 15 72% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 81.4 DQ Write 25 DQ Mixed 19.8 23% 42.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD CT16G4SFRA266.C8FE 20GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 16384 MB Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.6% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 12.5 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.5 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	7	60	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DJ_M509DJ Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509DJ_M509DJ

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	39x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples	9x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	29x
GeForce MX230NvidiaBench 10%, 6,801 samples	12x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	8x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	15x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ3 128GBKingstonBench 75%, 760 samples	5x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	5x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	41x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	4x
M471A5244CB0-CTD J642GU44J9266ND 20GBSamsungBench 48%, 4 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16