Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics66.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 03:43
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 80.9
50% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 188
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.6% Good
Lighting 87.1
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 74.3
71% 82.1 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 70.4
58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
683GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 85 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 152
Write 142
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 83.4
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 0.7
9% 3.8 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 23%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 82 62 85 95 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 114
Write 116
Mixed 80
SusWrite 84.3
73% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-10666CL8-2GBECO F3-10666CL8-2GBECO 12GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.6% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 4R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 6% 116 246 153 60 24.5" 1920 1080 ACR0624 XF251Q
History: Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 25: 4R 1G 2B
Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback