PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T5600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T5600 (all builds) |
Memory | 34.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131103 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 18 '21 at 23:38 |
Run Duration | 214 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 96% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
|
45.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 600
HP(103C 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
|
3.03%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 256GB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM08D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 140 71 111 163 70 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$149
1TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 28 20 21 29 19 MB/s
|
7.15%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 138 70 105 146 69 MB/s
|
62.6%
Good
|
|||
WD My Book 25ED 8TB
53GB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 22 11 19 23 11 MB/s
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 10TB
311GB free, PID 331a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 82 44 63 90 44 MB/s
|
33.1%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung PSSD T7 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 4001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 38 14 32 39 15 MB/s
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 18TB
15.5TB free, PID 25a3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 84 46 64 93 46 MB/s
|
52.7%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.8%
Good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 95x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 81x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 62x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 51x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 49x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 46x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 119% - Outstanding | Total price: $169 |