Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 21:23
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$350
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 137
2-Core 255
93% 161 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 655
70% 546 Pts
64-Core 672
45% 672 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$220
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 100
54% 77.2 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 47
56% 60.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55%
Great: 60%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 132 137 155 128 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 415
Write 178
Mixed 184
SusWrite 136
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 24.1
92% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 64.8
DQ Mixed 102
94% 152 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 80%
Nvme CT1000P 1TB
457GB free
Firmware: P3CR Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1008 1066 1068 1033 1032 1012 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,153
Write 1,013
Mixed 880
SusWrite 1,036
230% 1,021 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 66.9
242% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 848
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 264
349% 631 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 220%
Great: 295%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$40
53GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 106 118 125 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 112
Write 89.4
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 109
62% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 113%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$80
111GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 111 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 72.9
Write 80.5
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 112
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$171
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.8% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 20.1
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 20.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 48: 5R 5G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 22% 81 316 248 144 23.5" 1920 1080 MSI1462 Optix G24C
History:
Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 9,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $1,279
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback