PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 178% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H110M-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180329 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 18 '21 at 18:12 |
Run Duration | 176 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 54% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-6400T
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
58.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
178%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 172 174 177 166 147 MB/s
|
86.4%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
89GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 149 149 149 150 150 MB/s
|
84.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: GG2OACY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 105 103 107 108 MB/s
|
60.5%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 32 34 34 35 35 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
74.4%
Very good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27% | 16% | 81 | 276 | 204 | 144 | 31.5" | 2560 1440 | AUS32B1 ASUS XG32V |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 148x |
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 131x |
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 97x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 120x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 86x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 55x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $338 |