Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KX626AA-ABZ a6555.it (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081023
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '21 at 16:12
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5450-$299 5,870 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 69.6 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 69 41% 60.5 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 162 22% 166 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	3.3% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 4.3 3% 4 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB 1,321 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 318GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 43 41 66 53 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 388 Write 43.5 Mixed 126 SusWrite 56.1 33% 153 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 41.6 4K Mixed 20.1 80% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 57.9 DQ Mixed 99.1 84% 126 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 316%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 157GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 196 199 168 126 121 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.8% Good	Read 254 Write 241 Mixed 234 SusWrite 163 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 35.5 115% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 192 144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 558GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 195 192 161 158 153 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.5 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	2	22	4	60	23.8"	1920 1080	HPN3545 HP 24f

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16