Acer AO725

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer AO725 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer ZA10_BZ
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '21 at 16:07
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-70 APU (2012 M.Za) 922 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Memory 45.8 1-Core 14.9 2-Core 28.2 22% 29.6 Pts	4-Core 27.7 8-Core 27.7 4% 27.7 Pts	64-Core 28 2% 28 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7290 821 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0740) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.83 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.5 1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK2565GSXV 250GB 265 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH011M SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 62 45 61 59 56 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 75 Write 65.6 Mixed 44.4 SusWrite 55.5 44% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 42%
Multiple Card Reader 16GB 2,333 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 11GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 19 23 21 22 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 24.2 Write 20.4 Mixed 20.4 SusWrite 20.8 29% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.4 163% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMT3020EC58E9F1333 1x4GB 2,506 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 4.2 10% 3.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 3.2 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	11.6"	1280 720	AUO325C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AO725 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 12%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Acer AO725

CPU
C-70 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 22%, 922 samples	15x
C-60 APUAMDBench 23%, 2,297 samples	13x

GPU
Radeon HD 7290AMDBench 1%, 821 samples	15x
Radeon HD 6290AMDBench 1%, 2,442 samples	13x

SSD
128GB 128GBNetacBench 58%, 1,666 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
MZ7TE128HMGR-00004 128GBSamsungBench 66%, 696 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F 1x2GBElpidaBench 17%, 293 samples	6x
ACR512X64D3S16C11G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 786 samples	2x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer AO725

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Acer AO725

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)