Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150919
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 13:47
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$42
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 161
71% 117 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 256
34% 256 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 34
Parallax 32.2
26% 32.6 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 22.9
24% 31.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 31 25 27 30 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 419
Write 400
Mixed 330
SusWrite 62.6
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 52.4
170% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 229
206% 313 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 118%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
237GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 140 141 141 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 89.1
Write 96.7
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 140
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.2
389% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 149 148 151 150 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 101
Mixed 70
SusWrite 148
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
595GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 133 139 138 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 137
Write 127
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 133
154% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
212% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 74%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
264GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 37.9
Write 32.5
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 40.8
46% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 2R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 16% 25 103 5 60 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD
History:
Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $435
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback