HP EliteBook 8570w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8570w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176B
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 11:56
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 173
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 423
44% 348 Pts
64-Core 445
30% 445 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M
HP(103C 176B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 306.96
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.1
0% 3.2 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 0.9
4% 3.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
69D03560 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 524A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.3 2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
50GB free
Firmware: GH2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 66.8
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 65.7
40% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 2.4 2.1 2.3 2.1 2.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Read 19
Write 5.8
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 2
9% 8.4 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 8%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.2 3.9 3.9 3.7 3.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Read 20.3
Write 3
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4
9% 8.32 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical EliteBook 8570w Builds (Compare 1,451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $196
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $268Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback