Asus VivoBook 12_ASUS Laptop E203MAS_R203MA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus VivoBook 12_ASUS Laptop E203MAS_R203MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E203MAS
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 11:20
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N4000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Memory 43.8
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 112
41% 70.8 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 110
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 1201) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.67% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.67%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown K4F6E3S4HM-MGCJ 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
18% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 6% 17 14 3 60 11.6" 1366 768 AUO225C
History:
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback