Asrock B560M Pro4/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B560M Pro4/ac (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '21 at 07:42
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$99 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 95.4 1-Core 128 2-Core 128 75% 117 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 128 17% 128 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$630 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Zotac(19DA 2612) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	130% Outstanding	Lighting 131 Reflection 115 Parallax 295 107% 180 fps	MRender 332 Gravity 241 Splatting 181 198% 251 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C710 M.2 NVMe SSD 1TB 639 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 847GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614B0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1013 767 518 310 307 307 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	170% Outstanding	Read 1,387 Write 1,392 Mixed 983 SusWrite 537 241% 1,075 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 33.9 159% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 894 DQ Write 677 DQ Mixed 592 495% 721 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 262%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 128GB-$80 665 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 91GB free, PID 16b3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 261 Write 190 Mixed 153 242% 202 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.4 89% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB 12,184 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 36.8 MC Mixed 30.7 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 37.2 SC Mixed 28.6 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 56 71% 56 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	9	317	272	240	24.5"	1920 1080	DELA0F6 Dell AW2518H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B560M Pro4/ac Builds (Compare 518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B560M Pro4/ac

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	98x
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	96x
Core i5-11400Intel $126Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	79x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	71x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	52x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	30x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	18x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	15x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $75Bench 200%, 52,084 samples	13x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	53x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples	20x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $443

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16