Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QM_FA506QM

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	94.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QM_FA506QM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506QM
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '21 at 07:21
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 19,785 User benchmarks, average bench 75% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 77.7 1-Core 149 2-Core 289 92% 172 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 990 92% 769 Pts	64-Core 1,348 84% 1,348 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop) 102,706 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 16A2) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.16.07 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.4% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 159 Parallax 112 101% 132 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 93.2 Splatting 83.6 82% 103 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 105%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB 9,047 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 391GB free (System drive) Firmware: 41000C20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1654 997 872 819 798 851 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	248% Outstanding	Read 2,387 Write 2,174 Mixed 1,738 SusWrite 998 408% 1,824 MB/s	4K Read 65.8 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 62.9 219% 67.1 MB/s	DQ Read 938 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 315 289% 468 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 248% Great: 313%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GB 19,121 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.7% Good	MC Read 23 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 24.9 64% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 25.3 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 27.2 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 56: 6R 6G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
56%	47%	43	306	229	60	27"	1920 1080	BNQ7F41 BenQ RL2755

History:

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QM_FA506QM Builds (Compare 519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QM_FA506QM

CPU
Ryzen 7 5800HAMDBench 75%, 19,785 samples	390x
Ryzen 9 5900HXAMDBench 78%, 12,809 samples	129x

GPU
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	315x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	204x

SSD
MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 166%, 12,842 samples	196x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBBench 217%, 9,047 samples	185x
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBBench 253%, 21,294 samples	36x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 19,121 samples	178x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	134x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 15,291 samples	88x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16